Tradition, ritual & cultural use
Oldest evidenced or proposed human use
| Early colonial record | Sixteenth century Sahagún’s Nahua informants described ololiuhqui as a seed that intoxicated, disclosed fearful visions and entered medicinal practice. Francisco Hernández described the twining white-flowered plant and rounded coriander-like seed during his New Spain research of the 1570s; the illustration appeared in the 1651 Roman edition. These texts are the earliest securely identifiable records presently available (Sahagún, 1950–1982; Hernández, 1651; Schultes, 1941). |
| Extirpation archives | Seventeenth century Ruiz de Alarcón’s 1629 Tratado and de la Serna’s 1656 manual recorded consultations, offerings, prayers and divinatory questions while instructing clergy to suppress them. Their density shows persistence under colonial rule, but their categories—“superstition”, “devil” and “idolatry”—belong to the prosecution apparatus, not neutral Indigenous description (Ruiz de Alarcón, 1629/1984; de la Serna, 1656/1953). |
| Pre-Conquest antiquity | Strongly inferred Nahuatl nomenclature, the breadth of early testimony and the practice’s entanglement with Indigenous medicine make a pre-Conquest history highly probable. There is, however, no securely published archaeobotanical I. corymbosa seed assemblage that fixes an earlier date. “Aztec drug” is thus historically meaningful but archaeologically less precise than is often assumed. |
| Iconographic proposals | Contested Peter Furst proposed that a flowering vine in the Tepantitla mural complex at Teotihuacan represented ololiuhqui and linked it with a rain/fertility complex. Similar identifications have been made for the Xochipilli statue. Formal resemblance and later analogy are insufficient for species-level certainty; these are hypotheses about deep history, not direct evidence (Furst, 1974). |
| Modern continuity | Twentieth–twenty-first centuries Field reports among Zapotec, Chinantec and Mazatec communities, and recent research among Mixtec, Nahua and Mazatec specialists in Guerrero, Oaxaca and Puebla, document continuing or remembered use of semilla de la Virgen, ololiuhqui and related morning-glory medicines (Schultes, 1941; Wasson, 1963; Fields, 1969; Fagetti, 2025). |
Peoples and traditions
Ritual practice and divinatory technique
Historical and ethnographic accounts describe seeds ground and suspended in water before oral consumption, commonly in darkness or at night. Silence, fasting, sexual abstinence, clean space, candles, copal, flowers and prayer appear in different regional records; no single sequence is universal. What recurs is a tightly framed question. The medicine is approached to disclose why an illness began, whether sorcery or interpersonal conflict is involved, where a lost object lies, who committed a theft, whether a traveller will return, or what treatment should follow. Darkness reduces ordinary distraction and makes dreamlike imagery, voices and bodily signs available for interpretation (Schultes, 1941; Wasson, 1963; Fields, 1969).
Colonial descriptions emphasise ingestion by a ritual specialist, yet later field reports also include patients who receive the seed under supervision while a knowledgeable attendant listens to their speech and helps interpret it. Divination is thus distributed among plant/fungus, sufferer, healer, kin and ritual setting. The answer may arrive as scene, person, animal, voice, remembered event or felt certainty rather than as spectacular visual display. Diagnosis and cure are socially joined: revelation can identify an offended being, neglected obligation or damaged relationship that subsequent prayer, offering, herbal treatment or restitution must address.
Colonial suppression and ritual endurance
The Spanish ecclesiastical campaign against ololiuhqui was unusually explicit. Confessional manuals asked about possession and consultation; extirpators destroyed seeds and punished practitioners. At the same time, colonial society continued to use Indigenous healers, and the documentary archive expanded because priests needed detailed descriptions of what they opposed. Later Catholic names do not prove that Indigenous cosmologies disappeared. “Seed of the Virgin” can position visionary agency within Marian protection while retaining local ideas of respect, reciprocity, offence and disclosure. The resulting tradition is syncretic in the historical sense of layered institutions and translations, not a lesser or derivative version of an imagined pristine rite (Aguirre Beltrán, 1963; Fagetti, 2025).